Quiz supporting St Andrew’s Church, Edburton

quiz nightWhy not put a team together and come along to our quiz night. (Teams will be made up of four people)

When: Friday 29th November 2013

Where:
Preston Nomads Cricket Ground
Fulking BN5 9NH
at 7.00pm for 7.30pm

Why: it’s an evening held in support of St Andrew’s Church at Edburton

How much: Tickets £7 per person including a Ploughman’s Platter

Who do I call: Ring Jane Warne on 01273-857322 or 07812-465-559 to Enter

With a bar and a raffle.

Event was sold out last year so book early!

Supporting St Andrew’s Church, Edburton

Fulking book benefits Church

Anthony Brooks 2008 The Changing Times of Fulking & EdburtonTony Brooks writes:

I would like to update all those who sponsored or purchased my book [Anthony R. Brooks (2008) The Changing Times of Fulking & Edburton. Chichester: RPM Print & Design] how the proceeds of £3,800 have been spent by the Church.

Originally it was earmarked for a new door to be added to the church entrance. After much thought the PCC decided that as the Church is used during the winter months twice a month for a maximum of two hours, money spent on a new door would not be cost effective. So a compromise was agreed:

  1. A warm air unit would be fitted over the church door inside.
  2. The entrance path to the church has been reshaped to include a patio to give more standing area.

I am pleased to say both projects are now complete.

[from Pigeon Post, August 2013]

Residential continuity in the nineteenth century


If you wander around the churchyard at St. Andrew’s peering at graves, you will soon get the impression that certain families persisted in the parish over several generations. But many of the older graves are hard to read and some are missing altogether. To get a more accurate sense of how many residents had parents who also lived in the parish, we need to turn to the nineteenth century census returns. The first ‘modern’ census, in 1841, only asked respondents if they had been born in the county in which they were then living. But the 1851 and subsequent censuses asked for both the county and the parish of birth. These later censuses thus permit a rather fine-grained analysis of the relation between where people were living and where they were born.

Year EdFulk AdjPar ElsSus OutSus Total
1851 57% 14% 26% 3% 288
1861 41% 18% 34% 6% 299
1871 41% 11% 38% 10% 300
1881 41% 11% 39% 8% 340
1891 39% 9% 38% 14% 358

Where were the residents of the parish born?

In this table[1], the rows correspond to the five censuses that took place in the second half of the nineteenth century. The columns show the census year; the percentage of the parish population who were born in the parish (i.e., in Edburton or Fulking, EdFulk); the percentage who were born in one of the immediately adjacent parishes (AdjPar), i.e., Poynings, Portslade, [Old] Shoreham, [Upper] Beeding, Henfield or Woodmancote; the percentage who were born elsewhere in Sussex (ElsSus); the percentage who were born outside Sussex (OutSus); and the total size of the population in the census year.

The first row is perhaps the most striking. In 1851, over 70% of the residents of the parish were living within easy walking distance of where they were born (i.e., in Edburton or Fulking or one of the immediately adjacent parishes) and only 3% had been born outside Sussex. By the last decade of the century, the corresponding figures were 48% and 14%, respectively, and the size of the local population had increased by nearly 25%.

The remaining four rows are notable more for their similarity each with the next than for any radical changes. As the total population increases, the proportion of residents born in the parish remains more or less constant, as does the proportion born in Sussex but outside the immediate area (ElsSus). The proportion born in the immediately adjacent parishes halves over the 1861-1891 period whilst the proportion born outside Sussex more than doubles.

The first table provides a good sense of where the population had come from in any given census year but it does not give us a sense of the family structure of the parish. To get that, we need to look at the way the main resident families[2] persisted over time:

Family 1841 1851 1861 1871 1881 1891
Barber 22 13 13 14 3 0
Baird/Beard 3 4 4 3 12 15
Burtenshaw 15 5 11 10 10 6
Cousins/Cozens 4 2 10 11 3 1
Jackson 5 7 5 2 7 0
Lelliot/Lelliott 10 12 20 4 10 0
Madgwick 0 3 4 2 2 1
Marchant 10 11 1 4 2 3
Morley 8 8 7 8 16 9
Page 1 1 7 18 10 9
Paine/Payne 40 40 27 10 6 10
Pollard 5 6 2 6 8 5
Sayers 3 4 5 3 7 15
Steel/Steele 16 29 14 13 14 13
Stevens 7 11 10 11 13 7
Stoveld/Stovell 5 9 9 4 3 7
Strevens/Strivens 12 14 13 8 11 14
Willet/Willett 10 7 8 13 5 5

Families resident in the parish for five contiguous censuses

These eighteen (extended) families comprised nearly two thirds of the population of the parish in 1851. By 1891, that proportion had declined to one third. The overall picture is thus rather what one would have expected: over the course of the second half of the nineteenth century, the outside world gradually made its presence felt in what had hitherto been a somewhat isolated rural parish.

Footnotes

[1] A couple of rows sum to 99% rather than 100% as a consequence of rounding.

[2] Family members are defined here by surname, not genetics. If Jane Paine marries Bert Burtenshaw and remains in the parish then she will be counted as a Burtenshaw, not as a Paine, in the following census. Where the census takers used alternant spellings for a surname, both are listed in the table.

References

  • Marion Woolgar (1995) Census transcriptions and surname index for Edburton & Fulking. Published by the Sussex Family History Group.

GJMG

The Roadmender Myth

St. Andrew's Edburton

“The little church at the foot of the grey-green down”, or so runs the title of this photograph of St. Andrew’s, Edburton in a 1922 edition of The Roadmender. But was it?

Margaret Barber (1869-1901), ‘MB’ henceforth, was the author of The Roadmender, a book of Christian allegory and Anglican mysticism that became a major best-seller in the English-speaking world following its posthumous publication as a book in 1902 under the name ‘Michael Fairless’. Its popularity proved to be enduring — it had sold more than 150,000 copies by 1910 and there had been over thirty reprints by December 1912. By 1930, there had been some fifty reprints. After the war Duckworth reprinted the book yet again, Citadel Press produced an edition with illustrations by Helen Monro Turner in 1948 and, as late as 1950, Collins released another new edition with specially commissioned woodcuts by Lennox Paterson. The book remains readily available today with dozens of versions listed on Amazon, including modern reprints. There’s even a Kindle edition.

A portrait of Margaret Barber by Elinor Dowson

Margaret Barber by Elinor Dowson
(drawn from a photograph)

The book was written, originally as a series of pieces for The Pilot, in 1900 and 1901, partly in a house in Cheyne Walk, London, and partly at Mockbridge House in Shermanbury, just north of Henfield. MB, a young woman of independent means and artistic inclination, had been in poor health for much of her life, eventually succumbing to kidney failure and tuberculosis in August 1901. By 1900, she was too ill to continue with sculpture and took to writing instead. A total of three books were to be published posthumously.

Although The Roadmender is suffused with a sense of location it is, more often than not, inexplicit as to exactly which locations the author had in mind [1]. But readers, reviewers, book illustrators and authors of travel guides are curious about such matters. They had to wait ten years even to discover who the author was. That information was released in 1912 by her literary executor, against the author’s express wish, as an antidote to the misinformed speculation that had developed around the book. One reference in the book was unambiguous even before her identity became known — from the house in Shermanbury she reports hearing the bells of “the monastery where the Bedesmen of St. Hugh watch and pray” (page 44). Other references, to the Thames and the Downs are less specific. Books with titles like The Roadmender Country (Lorma Leigh, 1922) and The Roadmender’s Country (George Bramwell Evens, 1924) were published to sate the geographical curiosity of her readers some two decades after the book that inspired them was originally published.

Lorma Leigh 1922 The_Roadmender_Country

The location that concerns this post is the subject of the following passage:

On Sundays my feet take ever the same way. First my temple service, and then five miles tramp over the tender, dewy fields, with their ineffable earthy smell, until I reach the little church at the foot of the grey-green down. Here, every Sunday, a young priest from a neighbouring village says Mass for the tiny hamlet, where all are very old or very young — for the heyday of life has no part under the long shadow of the hills, but is away at sea or in service. There is a beautiful seemliness in the extreme youth of the priest who serves these aged children of God. He bends to communicate them with the reverent tenderness of a son, and reads with the careful intonation of far-seeing love. To the old people he is the son of their old age, God-sent to guide their tottering footsteps along the highway of foolish wayfarers; and he, with his youth and strength, wishes no better task. Service ended, we greet each other friendly — for men should not be strange in the acre of God; and I pass through the little hamlet and out and up on the grey down beyond. Here, at the last gate, I pause for breakfast; and then up and on with quickening pulse, and evergreen memory of the weary war-worn Greeks who broke rank to greet the great blue Mother-way that led to home. I stand on the summit hatless, the wind in my hair, the smack of salt on my cheek, all round me rolling stretches of cloud-shadowed down, no sound but the shrill mourn of the peewit and the gathering of the sea. [The Roadmender, pages 10-11]

Over the last hundred years, it has been widely assumed, by those who have had occasion to care about such matters, that “the little church at the foot of the grey-green down” is St. Andrew’s at Edburton. Writing in the Observer in 1921, Arthur Anderson made the claim explicitly. Such was also clearly the working assumption of Will F. Taylor, the photographer who did the illustrations for a 1922 US edition published by E.P. Dutton and whose image of St. Andrew’s can be seen at the top of this post. In the 1950s F.A. Howe, who lived right next door to St. Andrew’s, reported that devotees of the book would occasionally turn up at the church. The 1999 edition of Tony Wales’s survey of West Sussex villages provides a modern example and is quite explicit: “St. Andrew .. is the little grey church in Michael Fairless’s strange Sussex book” (page 90).

Margaret Barber drawn from life by Elinor Dowson in July 1901

Margaret Barber in July 1901
(drawn from life by Elinor Dowson)

From a purely cartographic perspective, the claim is plausible. St. Andrew’s is a small church and it does indeed sit at the foot of the Downs. Furthermore, it is the only such church that is approximately five miles distant from Shermanbury. But if one regards the quoted passage as a bit of quasi-autobiography, then the plausibility drains away. MB’s only first-hand knowledge of Sussex came from the period at the end of her life when she lived with the Dowson family. She was an invalid requiring assistance even to get from her ground-floor bedroom to the garden outside. It is inconceivable that she could ever have walked from Shermanbury to Edburton, much less ascended the steep Downs escarpment behind the church. So the passage cannot be a chunk of her own biography describing St. Andrew’s. Could it perhaps be a poetic adaptation of a contemporary report of a walk taken by a member of the Dowson family or someone else that she knew in Shermanbury? This seems very unlikely for a reason given by F.A. Howe: “there is no period at this time when the living was vacant, involving the ministrations of a priest from another parish” (1958, page 61).

As Howe notes, Anderson was to withdraw his claim just three years after he originally made it:

When I wrote my Observer articles, I hazarded the suggestion that this little church could be no other than Edburton, which fits, and alone fits, the geographical conditions, but I have learned since that though Michael Fairless had in mind an actual church it was one in another English county, far from Sussex. My suggestion has, however, not only been adopted by others; it has been expanded into an assertion that Michael Fairless herself often kneeled before the altar here [2]. For this statement there will henceforth be no warrant, though I daresay the suggestion, once having been made, will still be repeated and to Edburton will still be attributed this association. [Quoted by Howe 1958, page 61.]

Anderson is probably incorrect in taking full responsibility for the original claim — others surely made the same inference that he had. But his pessimism about ever getting it corrected it was clearly appropriate. The myth lives on.

The White Gate, an etching by Will G. Mein from the endpapers of Scott Palmer & Haggard 1913

The White Gate, an etching by Will G. Mein from the endpapers of Scott Palmer & Haggard 1913. This was a real gate, visible from MB’s room in Mockbridge House. MB used it as a symbol of the point of transition from life on earth to “a land from which there is no return” (page 158).

Footnotes

[1] Likewise, the book rarely names contemporary figures. But MB makes an exception for John Ruskin who had died at exactly the point that she had begun writing The Roadmender. She seems to have had no fear about encountering him in the hereafter:

John Ruskin scolded and fought and did yeoman service, somewhat hindered by his over-good conceit of himself. [The Roadmender, page 139]

[2] And, of course, MB’s grave is not to be found in the churchyard at St. Andrew’s, Edburton. There is no reason for it to be there. It was her wish that she be buried at St. Giles, Shermanbury but the old churchyard was closed for interments at the time of her death (The Landmark VI.1, 1924, page 602). Instead, her grave is to be found at St. James, Ashurst.

References

  • Alan Barwick (2013) “Notes for The Roadmender talk”. Henfield Museum: manuscript. [This paper is the single best source for the biographical details of MB’s brief life and is based, in part, on a recent bequest of documents to the museum. The illustrated talk itself includes a remarkable collection of modern and historical images that document aspects of that life.]
  • Michael Fairless (1902) The Roadmender. London: Duckworth. [As noted in the text above, the book remains readily available. You can also download it as a PDF file, or read it on the web.]
  • F.A. Howe (1958) A Chronicle of Edburton and Fulking in the County of Sussex. Crawley: Hubners Ltd, page 61. [Howe’s single paragraph on this topic inspired the present post — which also borrows the section title he used in his contents list.]
  • W. Scott Palmer & A.M. Haggard (1913) Michael Fairless: Her Life and Writings. London: Duckworth (PDF). [The first author was MB’s close friend and literary executor, Mary Dowson, and the second was MB’s eldest sister. The book includes two portraits of MB by Elinor Dowson, both reproduced above. MB was known as Marjorie Dowson for the final few years of her life.]
  • Tony Wales (1999) The West Sussex Village Book. Newbury: Countryside Books, page 90.

GJMG
The end of The Roadmender

Currently popular local history posts: